Written by: Julie Baqleh Coming forward about historical sexual abuse takes immense courage, especially when the abuse happened years or decades ago in institutions where power, fear, or shame stopped you from speaking out. If you experienced sexual abuse as a child in schools, churches, foster care, youth organisations, or similar settings, it’s important to understand your rights and legal options today.
Since the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australian law has changed to recognise that many survivors cannot disclose abuse immediately, removing key barriers to historical claims. This December 2025 guide outlines how historical sexual abuse compensation works, who can claim, and the pathways to accountability and financial recovery, no matter how long ago the abuse occurred.
Understanding historical abuse
Historical sexual abuse refers to sexual abuse that occurred in the past—typically years or decades ago—often during childhood and frequently in institutional settings. The term “historical” doesn’t diminish the seriousness of the abuse or its ongoing impacts. Instead, it acknowledges the time gap between when abuse occurred and when survivors feel able to come forward and pursue legal action.
Â
Historical abuse claims mainly involve institutional contexts where children were under the care, supervision, or authority of organisations. This includes:
- Churches and religious institutions
- Schools (government and private)
- Foster care and residential facilities
- Government agencies caring for wards of the state
- Sporting organisations and clubs
- Youth groups, like Scouts
- Disability services
- Juvenile detention centres
- Other organisations responsible for children’s welfare.
Â
The institutional nature of historical abuse is significant because institutions had—and breached—duties of care to protect children in their care. Unlike abuse by strangers, institutional abuse involves betrayal by organisations and individuals who held positions of trust and authority over vulnerable children.
Why survivors delay disclosure
Understanding why survivors often cannot disclose abuse immediately is crucial to recognising the legitimacy of historical claims. Common barriers include:
| Shame and self-blame | Many child abuse survivors internalise guilt, believing they were somehow responsible for their abuse, despite being children who were unable to consent or resist authority figures. |
| Fear of not being believed | Children often fear adults won’t believe their allegations against respected teachers, clergy, coaches, or other authority figures, particularly in eras when children’s credibility was routinely questioned. |
| Threats and intimidation | Perpetrators frequently threaten children to ensure silence, warning of consequences for themselves, their families, or other children if the abuse is disclosed. |
| Lack of understanding | Young children may not understand that what happened was abuse, particularly when perpetrators normalised the conduct or manipulated children into believing it was acceptable. |
| Institutional suppression | Many institutions actively discouraged reporting, protected perpetrators, or threatened consequences for children who spoke out, creating environments where disclosure felt impossible. |
| Trauma impacts | Sexual abuse causes psychological trauma that often manifests as dissociation, memory suppression, and difficulty processing experiences until years later, sometimes in adulthood when survivors have distance and therapeutic support. |
Important note
Delayed disclosure is the norm, not the exception, in child sexual abuse cases. Research for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse found that many survivors did not tell anyone about their abuse until well into adulthood, with a mean delay of 23.9 years before disclosure occurred. This delay doesn’t indicate false allegations or less serious abuse; it reflects the profound psychological impacts and barriers to reporting that characterise institutional child sexual abuse.
Â
Australian law now recognises these realities, removing time limits that previously prevented survivors from seeking justice simply because trauma, shame, or circumstances prevented immediate disclosure.
Eligibility for historical abuse compensation
Understanding who can pursue historical abuse claims helps you assess whether your circumstances qualify for compensation.
Who can make a claim?
| Survivors of childhood sexual abuse | If you experienced sexual abuse before turning 18 in institutional settings, you can pursue historical sexual abuse claims regardless of how long ago it occurred. The removal of time limits in most Australian states means that even decades-old abuse is now actionable. Survivors may also be eligible for the National Redress Scheme for recognition and support, as well as pursue civil claims for compensation through the courts. |
| Survivors of adult institutional abuse | Some civil claims can address sexual abuse experienced as an adult in institutional contexts such as psychiatric facilities, disability services, nursing homes, or residential care, although eligibility varies by jurisdiction. |
| Family members of deceased survivors | In limited circumstances, family members may pursue claims related to a deceased survivor. This may include continuing a claim the survivor had already commenced, bringing a wrongful death claim, or seeking compensation for psychological harm (nervous shock) suffered as a result of the abuse. |
Types of abuse covered
Historical child abuse compensation covers a wide range of sexual abuse:
- Rape and sexual assault
- Inappropriate touching or fondling
- Exposure to sexual material or acts
- Grooming and sexual exploitation
- Sexual harassment
- Verbal sexual abuse
- Forced participation in sexual acts.
Â
The abuse does not need to involve physical contact. Non-contact abuse can also form the basis of a historical abuse claim, including;
- Exposure
- Voyeurism
- Other sexual misconduct by someone in a position of authority over a child.
Institutional contexts
Historical sexual abuse claims can be brought against institutions where abuse occurred, including:
- Religious institutions: Churches, parishes, religious schools, youth ministries
- Educational institutions: Government schools, private schools, boarding schools
- Out-of-home care: Foster care, group homes, residential facilities, orphanages
- Youth organisations: Scouts, sporting clubs, youth groups
- Disability and mental health services: Institutions caring for vulnerable young people
- Juvenile justice: Youth detention centres, correctional facilities.
The institution must have had responsibility for your care, supervision, or welfare when abuse occurred, creating a duty of care they breached by failing to protect you.
How to prove historical abuse
Building strong historical abuse claims requires demonstrating that abuse occurred, that institutions were responsible, and that you’ve suffered compensable harm. While time creates evidentiary challenges, Australian courts recognise these difficulties and allow various forms of proof.
1. Your testimony as evidence
Your account of the abuse is itself evidence. Courts recognise that child sexual abuse typically occurs in private without witnesses, making survivor testimony often the primary evidence. You don’t need corroboration or physical evidence to pursue historical sex abuse claims—your credible testimony about what occurred, who perpetrated it, and the institutional context provides the foundation for your case.
Â
Trauma’s impact on memory is well-understood by courts. If your recollections are fragmented, if you remember some details clearly but not others, or if your memories have returned gradually over time, these patterns are consistent with trauma and don’t undermine your credibility.
Key takeaway
You don’t need perfect memories or extensive documentation to pursue historical sexual abuse compensation. Courts understand that time and trauma affect evidence availability and that institutional abuse typically occurred in private. Your testimony combined with expert evidence about abuse impacts often suffices to establish compelling claims, particularly when institutional records reveal systemic failures.
2. Supporting documentation
While not required, additional evidence strengthens claims. This may include:
| Institutional records | School reports, enrolment records, and residential care documents can prove your presence at the institution when the abuse occurred. These records may also show behavioural changes, disciplinary issues, or other indicators consistent with the impact of abuse. |
| Medical records | Contemporary medical records documenting injuries, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, or psychological symptoms linked to abuse are important. Current medical evidence can also demonstrate ongoing trauma and its effects. |
| Contemporaneous reports | Documents showing that you disclosed abuse at the time—to parents, teachers, counsellors, or police—are valuable, even if no action was taken. Records of ignored or mishandled reports can help highlight institutional failures. |
| Previous complaints about the perpetrator | Evidence that the institution received other complaints about the same perpetrator before, during, or after your abuse can show they knew—or should have known—about the risk posed. |
| Criminal proceedings | If the perpetrator was convicted of sexual offences against you or others, court records provide strong corroboration and help establish that the abuse occurred. |
3. Expert evidence
Independent experts provide crucial evidence in historical abuse claims:
| Psychologists and psychiatrists | These professionals assess your current mental health, diagnose conditions such as PTSD, depression, or anxiety, link them to childhood sexual abuse, provide prognoses for ongoing treatment, and explain how trauma can affect memory and disclosure patterns. |
| Institutional experts | Specialists in institutional practices evaluate whether the organisation’s policies, procedures, and responses met appropriate standards. They identify missed warning signs and determine whether systemic failures allowed abuse to occur. |
| Vocational experts | Vocational assessors examine how abuse affected your education, career path, and earning potential, providing a quantified assessment of economic losses. |
4. Collecting evidence
Your institutional abuse lawyer manages evidence gathering, using legal powers to obtain institutional records that organisations must provide in litigation.
Â
This often reveals documents showing:
- The institution received complaints or warnings about perpetrators
- Perpetrators were moved between locations rather than removed
- Safeguarding policies were inadequate or not followed
- Systemic failures enabled abuse to continue.
Â
Starting the evidence collection process early preserves records before document retention periods expire or organisations claim documents no longer exist.
Legal insight
Institutions often argue they had no notice of abuse, claim perpetrators were independent contractors, assert safeguarding policies were adequate, or suggest delayed reporting. Experienced historical abuse lawyers counter these defences by proving systemic failures, vicarious liability, and institutional barriers that prevented timely disclosure.
Filing historical abuse claims
Understanding the practical process for pursuing historical child abuse claims helps you navigate what might otherwise feel overwhelming.
Seeking legal representation
The first step involves consulting lawyers specialising in historical sexual abuse claims.
Â
At GMP Law, we offer a free initial consultation where we will assess your case, explain your options, and outline the process. Our specialist lawyers understand trauma-informed approaches, recognise disclosure patterns, and know how to build strong cases despite time and evidentiary challenges.
Â
Our historical abuse lawyers work on a No Win No Fee basis, meaning you pay no legal fees unless your case succeeds. This eliminates financial barriers to pursuing justice regardless of your current circumstances.
Â
Get a free claim check
Choosing your legal pathway
You typically have two main options for pursuing historical abuse compensation:
- National Redress Scheme: Established following the Royal Commission, this government scheme provides payments up to $150,000 for survivors of institutional child sexual abuse, plus access to counselling and direct responses from institutions. The scheme offers a less adversarial process but has significant limitations, including capped payments, predetermined assessment categories, and preventing further civil action once accepted.
- Civil claims through courts: Suing institutions directly through civil litigation allows individualised assessment of your circumstances and typically results in substantially higher compensation. While more formal than redress, most civil claims settle through negotiation rather than trial.
Â
Your lawyer will help determine which pathway is best for your situation, particularly because accepting a redress payment usually prevents you from pursuing a separate civil claim.
Â
Learn more: Legal alternatives to the National Redress Scheme
Compensation amounts for historical abuse
Historical abuse compensation varies significantly based on abuse severity, duration, life impacts, and whether you pursue the National Redress Scheme or a civil claim.
National Redress Scheme payments
The scheme offers payments up to $150,000, determined by predetermined assessment matrices categorising abuse severity. Average payments hover around $89,300 (current as of June 2025), reflecting how standardised categories often fail to capture individual circumstances.
Â
Once you accept a redress payment, you cannot pursue further civil action against that institution for the same abuse, making this decision permanent and irrevocable.
Legal insight
Historical child abuse compensation through civil claims typically achieves three to ten times more than National Redress Scheme payments for comparable abuse. This difference reflects how comprehensive, individualised assessment reveals impacts that predetermined categories cannot capture.
Civil claim compensation
Civil historical sexual abuse claims allow individualised assessment of all losses and life impacts, consistently achieving substantially higher compensation than redress payments.
Â
Civil compensation is assessed individually, so amounts vary. In our experience, however, nearly every civil claim exceeds $150,000, with many cases settling for well over $1 million.
Find out how much you can claim today
Typical ranges include:
| Isolated incidents with moderate impact | Up to $250,000 | Even less severe abuse can result in payments exceeding the maximum Redress Scheme amounts. For example, a man abused by a priest during pastoral care visits in 1971 was awarded $230,000 by the Victorian Supreme Court (Catholic Diocese of Ballarat), reflecting decades of trauma, including complex PTSD and ongoing therapeutic needs. |
| Serious abuse with significant ongoing impacts | $250,000 to $600,000 | Prolonged or severe abuse causing substantial psychological trauma, career disruption, relationship difficulties, and the need for ongoing treatment typically falls within this range. For instance, a survivor of historical sexual abuse at a NSW youth group secured $435,000 after evidence of long-term psychological injury, including PTSD and depressive disorder. |
| Severe and catastrophic abuse | $600,000 to $1,000,000+ | Abuse resulting in profound psychological damage, total disability, inability to work, or the need for lifetime care can attract compensation exceeding $1 million. |
Civil compensation covers:
- Economic losses: Medical costs, lost income, vocational rehabilitation, and care costs.
- Non-economic losses: Pain and suffering, psychological trauma, relationship impacts, and reduced quality of life.
Â
Your lawyer ensures all impacts are properly documented, valued, and pursued in compensation negotiations.
