Written by: Richele Nelsen The National Redress Scheme represents an important acknowledgment of institutional child sexual abuse in Australia, providing survivors with access to compensation, counselling, and direct responses from responsible institutions. However, the scheme isn’t the only—or necessarily the best—pathway for seeking redress.
Â
For many survivors, civil claims through the court system offer substantially higher compensation, more comprehensive recognition of harm, and greater flexibility in holding institutions accountable. Understanding the alternatives to the National Redress Scheme helps you make informed decisions about which pathway best serves your needs and circumstances.
Â
This December 2025 guide explains what the National Redress Scheme offers, its limitations, and why civil claims often represent a stronger option for institutional abuse survivors seeking fair compensation.
What is the National Redress Scheme?
The National Redress Scheme was established by the Australian Government in 2018 following recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The scheme provides recognition and support to survivors of institutional child sexual abuse through three components:
- Monetary payment up to $150,000
- Access to psychological counselling
- The option to request a direct personal response from the responsible institution.
Eligibility for the redress scheme
To qualify for National Redress Scheme payments, you must meet specific criteria.
Â
Eligibility is restricted to institutional child sexual abuse. You must:
- Have experienced sexual abuse before turning 18 years of age
- The abuse must have occurred before 1 July 2018
- It must have happened in an institution or during institutional activities
- You must be an Australian citizen or permanent resident when applying (with specific exceptions for former child migrants)
- You must have been born before 30 June 2010.
Â
The scheme defines institutions broadly to include:
- Schools
- Child care providers
- Churches
- Sporting organisations
- Foster care
- Youth detention centres
- Government agencies, such as the NSW Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) for wards of the state
- Various other organisations that are responsible for children’s care.
Â
However, only institutions that have joined the scheme can be held accountable through this process. If your abuser’s institution hasn’t joined, you cannot access redress through this pathway.
How redress payments are calculated
National Redress Scheme compensation is determined through assessment matrices that categorise abuse severity into predetermined bands. Assessors consider factors including:
- The nature of the abuse
- Its duration and frequency
- The impact on your life
- Any previous payments you’ve received.
Â
However, this assessment follows set criteria rather than an individualised evaluation of your specific circumstances.
As of June 2025, the average redress scheme payout is $89,300, significantly below the $150,000 maximum. This demonstrates how the predetermined assessment categories often fail to capture the full extent of harm survivors have suffered.
Critical limitation
Once you accept a National Redress Scheme payment, you cannot pursue further legal action against the same institution for the same abuse. This finality means you must carefully consider whether capped scheme payments adequately compensate for lifelong impacts before accepting an offer.
Key limitations of the National Redress Scheme
While the redress scheme provides an accessible pathway for some survivors, significant limitations make it unsuitable or inadequate for many institutional abuse cases.
| 1. Compensation cap and average payments | The $150,000 maximum payment falls far short of compensation achievable through civil claims for serious abuse cases. More concerningly, the average National Redress Scheme compensation of $89,300 demonstrates that most survivors receive substantially less than the cap. Â Civil claims regularly achieve $300,000 to $800,000 for serious institutional abuse, with some cases exceeding $1 million when abuse caused catastrophic impacts. Â This disparity reflects fundamental differences in assessment approaches. The redress uses predetermined categories while civil claims individually assess how abuse specifically affected your life, relationships, mental health, education, career, and future prospects. |
| 2. Limited to sexual abuse only | The National Redress Scheme covers only sexual abuse, excluding survivors of physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, and other forms of institutional maltreatment. If you experienced multiple forms of abuse—as many institutional abuse survivors did—redress only addresses the sexual component, leaving other serious harm unrecognised and uncompensated.  Civil claims encompass all forms of institutional abuse, allowing comprehensive compensation for the full range of harm you suffered, regardless of whether it fits narrow sexual abuse definitions. |
| 3. Institutional participation requirements | You can only claim through the redress scheme if the responsible institution has joined as a participating member. While many major institutions have joined, some haven’t, leaving survivors without access to this pathway. Additionally, if an institution has ceased to exist or cannot be identified, scheme access may be impossible even for clear abuse cases. Â Civil claims aren’t restricted by institutional participation. You can sue any institution responsible for your abuse regardless of whether they joined the redress scheme, and legal mechanisms exist to identify successor entities or responsible parties, even when original institutions have closed. |
| 4. Assessment process lacks individualisation | Redress scheme assessments apply predetermined criteria and matrices that categorise abuse rather than comprehensively evaluating your unique circumstances. Â This standardised approach cannot adequately account for individual factors, like: Â
 Civil claims allow detailed, individualised assessment supported by expert evidence specifically addressing how abuse affected you. This results in compensation that reflects your actual losses rather than category assignments. |
| 5. Prevents further legal action | Perhaps the most significant limitation is that accepting redress prevents you from pursuing civil claims against the same institution for the same abuse. This finality means you cannot later seek additional compensation if you discover the scheme payment inadequately compensated your losses or if your condition worsens over time. Â This irrevocable decision requires careful consideration. Once you accept redress sche |
What are civil claims for institutional abuse?
Civil institutional abuse claims represent an alternative to the redress scheme where survivors sue institutions directly through the court system. This pathway operates independently of the National Redress Scheme and often provides substantially better outcomes for survivors seeking comprehensive compensation.
How civil claims work
Civil institutional abuse claims involve bringing legal action against the institution responsible for your abuse, alleging they breached their duty of care to protect you. You can sue for all forms of institutional abuse—sexual, physical, emotional, and neglect—not just sexual abuse covered by redress.
Â
Claims typically allege that institutions:
- Failed to properly screen employees or volunteers
- Didn’t provide adequate supervision
- Ignored warning signs or reports of abuse
- Moved known perpetrators rather than removing them
- Created cultures that enabled abuse
- Failed to implement appropriate child protection policies.
Â
Most civil claims settle through negotiation rather than going to trial, but the litigation framework ensures institutions take claims seriously and engage meaningfully in settlement discussions backed by the possibility of court proceedings.
Advantages over the National Redress Scheme
| 1. Higher compensation amounts | Civil claims consistently achieve substantially higher compensation than redress scheme payments. While redress caps at $150,000 (with $89,300 average), civil settlements regularly reach $300,000 to over $1 million depending on abuse severity and life impacts. This difference reflects individualised assessment versus predetermined categories. |
| 2. Comprehensive coverage of all abuse types | Civil claims address all institutional or historical child abuse—physical, sexual, emotional, neglect—allowing recognition and compensation for the full scope of harm you suffered. You’re not limited to sexual abuse only as with the redress scheme. |
| 3. No institutional participation requirement | You can pursue a civil claim against any institution responsible for your abuse — including organisations that never joined the National Redress Scheme, as well as settings like aged-care and nursing homes, which are not covered by the Scheme at all. Civil action provides a pathway to justice even when redress is unavailable or an institution refuses to participate. |
| 4. Individualised assessment | Civil claims involve detailed evaluation of how abuse specifically affected your life, supported by expert evidence addressing your particular circumstances, mental health impacts, career effects, relationship difficulties, and ongoing needs. |
| 5. Covers adult abuse | The Redress Scheme only addresses childhood abuse (before age 18), but civil claims can include abuse you experienced as an adult in institutional settings, recognising that vulnerability and institutional duty of care don’t end at 18. |
Key takeaway
Think of the National Redress Scheme as a predetermined payment offer based on abuse categories, while civil claims represent individualised evaluation of how that abuse actually affected your specific life. For serious abuse with significant ongoing impacts, this difference typically results in civil compensation three to ten times higher than redress payments.
Institutional abuse compensation options explained
Having outlined the advantages and limitations of both pathways, it’s important to understand how each option actually works in practice. Knowing the procedural requirements, timeframes, and strategic considerations of civil claims and the National Redress Scheme will help you identify which avenue best aligns with your circumstances and goals.
Civil common law claims: Process and timeframes
Civil claims offer the broadest scope for compensation, but they also follow a more structured legal process. A civil claim is usually triggered by engaging with an institutional abuse lawyer, who:
- Investigates the institution’s responsibility
- Gathers records from Government departments and
- organisations involved in your care
Commissions expert assessments early in the process.
Â
Evidence can include historical files, medical records, past reports, and witness statements. Institutions are formally notified of the allegations, which starts the pre-litigation negotiation process.
Â
Civil claims can progress through several stages: investigation, expert reports, institution response, negotiation, mediation, and, if necessary, court proceedings. While most resolve before trial, the civil pathway requires patience. Timeframes typically range from 18 months to three years and depend on how quickly documents are released, how complex the abuse history is, and whether multiple institutions are involved.
Â
Civil claims give you control, enabling you to pursue a tailored compensation outcome and require institutions to meaningfully engage with your case.
National Redress Scheme: Process and timeframes
The National Redress Scheme, while limited in scope, has its own distinct process and may suit certain circumstances. The institution responsible must be participating in the Scheme. Applications are triggered by lodging a formal redress submission through the Scheme’s portal, supported by available records or details of the abuse. Unlike civil claims, the Scheme itself gathers evidence directly from participating institutions.
Â
While the Scheme operates on a non-adversial model, decisions still take time. Although faster than civil litigation, assessments commonly take between 12 and 18 months. The process may take longer if the claim is complex and if multiple institutions are involved.
Â
Redress may be suitable for survivors who prefer a simpler option, whose experiences fall within the scheme’s capped compensation ranges, or whose health requires a less demanding process. However, before applying, survivors should obtain specialist advice to understand that accepting redress will extinguish their right to pursue a civil claim.
Get a free claim check
Who is eligible for civil institutional abuse claims?
Civil institutional abuse claims have broader eligibility than the National Redress Scheme, making them accessible to more survivors.
| No age restrictions on when the abuse occurred | Unlike the redress scheme’s requirement that abuse occurred before age 18, civil claims can address institutional abuse experienced at any age. Adult abuse in residential care, psychiatric facilities, disability services, or other institutional settings is fully compensable through civil litigation. |
| All abuse types covered | Physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional and psychological abuse, neglect and failure to provide care, and systemic failures in supervision and protection all support civil claims. You’re not limited to sexual abuse only. |
| No requirement for institutional participation | Civil claims can be brought against any institution regardless of whether they joined the National Redress Scheme. If an institution has dissolved, successor entities, related organisations, or insurers can often be held accountable. |
Time limits and exceptions
While limitation periods technically apply to civil claims, most Australian states removed time limits for child sexual abuse following the Royal Commission. For other abuse types, three-year limitation periods often apply but may be extended where:
- You have mental incapacity preventing you from understanding your rights
- Trauma prevented you from linking abuse to current problems until recently
- Institutional concealment delayed your discovery of the full extent of harm.
Â
Courts frequently exercise discretion to allow historical institutional abuse claims recognising the unique barriers to timely reporting in these cases.
Choosing between redress and civil claims
Deciding which pathway to pursue requires careful consideration of your circumstances, priorities, and the likely outcomes each option offers.
Factors favouring civil claims
- Serious or prolonged abuse: The more severe your abuse or the greater its impact on your life, the larger the gap between redress payments and appropriate civil compensation. Serious abuse deserves individualised assessment, not predetermined categories.
- Significant life impacts: If abuse substantially affected your education, career, relationships, mental health, or quality of life, civil claims properly value these impacts while redress categories cannot.
- Multiple abuse types: If you experienced physical, emotional, and sexual abuse, civil claims compensate all forms while redress only addresses sexual abuse.
- Non-participating institutions: If the responsible institution hasn’t joined the redress scheme, civil claims provide your only pathway to compensation.
- Adult abuse: Abuse that occurred after age 18 isn’t covered by redress but is fully compensable through civil claims.
Factors favouring redress
- Less severe abuse with limited impacts: If abuse was isolated, your recovery has been relatively complete, and you’re not seeking maximum compensation, redress may provide adequate acknowledgment with less process complexity.
- Health or time concerns: If health issues or advanced age make you prioritise faster resolution over higher compensation, redress’s somewhat quicker timeline may appeal.
- Desire to avoid litigation: Some survivors prefer redress’s less adversarial process, though most civil claims settle without trial through negotiation or mediation.
Find out how much you can claim today
How much compensation can you receive through civil claims?
Moderate abuse cases—typically involving isolated incidents or shorter-term abuse with moderate psychological harm—often settle for $100,000 to $300,000, already above the redress cap. More serious cases, such as prolonged sexual or severe physical abuse causing significant ongoing trauma, commonly resolve between $300,000 and $800,000, reflecting impacts on employment, relationships, treatment needs, and overall quality of life. The most severe or catastrophic cases, involving profound psychological injury, permanent disability, inability to work, or lifelong care needs, can exceed $1 million.
Â
These higher amounts reflect civil claims’ comprehensive assessment of:
- Economic losses: All medical expenses (past and future), lost income and earning capacity, vocational rehabilitation, ongoing therapy needs, and care costs.
- Non-economic losses: Pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, psychological trauma, relationship impacts, and reduced quality of life.
- Institutional betrayal: Recognition of the unique harm when abuse occurs in institutions responsible for your care and protection.
Â
Legal insight
In our experience representing institutional abuse survivors, civil claims consistently achieve compensation three to ten times higher than redress scheme payments for comparable abuse. More importantly, survivors express greater satisfaction with civil processes that allowed their individual stories to be heard and their specific life impacts properly recognised, rather than being assessed against impersonal categories.
