-
Are you in Other? If not, please update your location below.
-
Other
Medical negligence is the failure of a healthcare provider to deliver care that meets professional standards, resulting in patient harm. The legal concept requires proving that a medical professional’s actions or inactions fell below what other competent practitioners would have done in similar circumstances.
Although medical negligence is common worldwide, creating clear, consistent rules for fair compensation and reducing broader community impact remains difficult (as described by the National Library of Medicine). That’s why having experienced legal professionals is crucial—they help navigate the complexities and fight for just outcomes.
To establish a valid medical negligence claim, four essential elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of standard care, resulting damages, and direct causation.
| Element | Description | Example |
| 1. Duty of care | To file a compensation claim, a clear and established patient-practitioner relationship must exist. You can pursue a claim against the healthcare provider who directly treated you (or the hospital through vicarious liability), as this creates a legal duty of care. | Doctor-patient consultation creates a legal obligation. |
| 2. Breach of standard care | Demonstrate that the healthcare provider’s actions deviated from the accepted medical standards. | The surgeon operates on the wrong body part. |
| 3. Resulting damages | Show that you suffered harm, whether physical, psychological, or financial. | The patient suffers permanent injury or disability. |
| 4. Direct causation | Establish that your injuries were directly caused by the healthcare provider’s breach of duty. | The injury wouldn’t have occurred without the negligent act. |
According to the Clinical Excellence Commission, a total of 84 sentinel events were reported across all Australian jurisdictions during the 2022–2023 period. This marks an increase from 71 events recorded in 2021–2022. Of the 84 events, NSW reported 24 cases.
These sentinel events included:
These critical incidents underscore the importance of being informed about your legal rights and available options if you or a loved one has been affected by medical negligence.
Medical negligence can manifest in various forms, from surgical errors to diagnostic failures. Understanding common scenarios helps patients recognise when they may have grounds for compensation.
Medical negligence does not include every poor or unexpected outcome. For a claim to be valid, there must be a failure to meet an accepted standard of care.
The following situations typically don’t qualify for compensation:
However, if you believe a medical practitioner has acted inappropriately or unprofessionally, even if it doesn’t amount to medical negligence, you may still have grounds for a formal complaint. In New South Wales, concerns about a practitioner’s conduct can be reported to the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC).
To prove medical negligence, you must show that your healthcare provider’s actions fell below the accepted professional standard of care and directly caused your injury or harm. This typically involves demonstrating that a competent practitioner in the same situation would have acted differently.
Proving negligence can be complex. Hospitals and providers may argue that your injury was the result of an underlying condition rather than substandard care. That’s why working with an experienced medical negligence lawyer is essential. They understand how to gather strong evidence, navigate expert opinions, and build a compelling case.
Time is critical in these matters. Acting quickly ensures vital evidence is preserved and strengthens your chances of success. Seeking prompt legal advice can help you protect your rights and maximise your compensation.
| Step | Action required | Timeline |
| 1. Medical records | Obtain complete treatment documentation | Immediately |
| 2. Second opinion | Get an independent medical assessment | Within weeks |
| 3. Expert witnesses | Secure specialist testimony | 2-6 months |
| 4. Damage documentation | Record all impacts and expenses | Ongoing |
| 5. Legal filing | Submit a formal claim | Within limitation period |
Expert testimony is essential in most medical negligence cases. It helps establish whether the healthcare provider met the appropriate standard of care and whether their actions directly caused the patient’s harm.
Medical experts are typically called upon to answer critical questions such as:
1. What would a reasonable practitioner have done in the same situation?
Experts explain what constitutes accepted medical practice in the given circumstances.
2. Did the provider’s actions fall below that standard?
They assess whether there was a breach of duty by comparing the provider’s actions to professional norms.
3. Did the breach cause the patient harm?
Experts evaluate whether the injury was a direct result of the negligent act or omission (causation).
4. What are the long-term effects on the patient?
They help quantify damages by assessing how the injury impacts the patient’s life, including physical, emotional, and financial consequences.
Importantly, courts consider the facts and decisions based on what was known at the time of the alleged negligence, not with the benefit of hindsight. This is why clear, objective expert analysis is so vital to a successful claim.
| Challenge | Key question |
| Pre-existing medical conditions | Would the harm have occurred anyway due to the underlying health issue? |
| Multiple contributing factors | Was negligence the primary cause, or one of several influences? |
| Complex medical histories | Can the injury be clearly attributed to a specific act or omission? |
| Natural disease progression | Would the outcome have been the same regardless of the care provided? |
| Type | Inclusions |
| Economic damages |
|
| Non-economic damages |
|
Medical negligence compensation in Australia varies widely, depending on the severity of the injury and the long-term impact on the patient. According to 2022–23 data from the Australian Government Actuary, most medical negligence claims settle for under $100,000. However, in more serious cases involving permanent or catastrophic harm, payouts can exceed $1 million.
As of May 2025, our recent medical negligence cases have secured compensation ranging from $180,000 to $700,000, varying depending on the severity of the injury and its impact on the client’s life.
While medical negligence laws in Australia are largely consistent across states, there are some notable differences.
| State | Legislation | Key features |
| NSW | Civil Liability Act 2002 |
|
| QLD | Civil Liability Act 2003 |
|
| VIC | Victoria’s Wrongs Act 1958 |
|
To help you understand how medical negligence cases play out in real life, let’s look at some recent cases we’ve handled at GMP Law. These past successful cases demonstrate the range of medical negligence situations and potential compensation outcomes as well as how proper legal representation can achieve justice for negligence victims.
| Case summary | Case details |
| Compensation awarded | $450,000 |
| Client background | Our client was a Sydney man with a debilitating nerve injury from a CT-guided biopsy in 2018. |
| Impact of injury | The nerve injury severely affected his ability to run his business and he now required family assistance to support his day-to-day. |
| Claim process | Successfully settled out of court. |
| Our approach |
|
| Outcome | Thorough preparation led to a successful resolution for the client. |
| Case summary | Case details |
| Compensation awarded | $50,000 |
| Client background | The client suffered due to negligent behaviour in an optometry office. |
| Nature of negligence | The client was provided with the wrong prescription glasses, which led to significant deterioration in her vision over time. |
| Claim process | Successfully settled the claim against the optometrist. |
| Defendant’s position | Denied liability; client’s injuries improved over time. |
| Our approach |
|
| Outcome | Efficient resolution of the matter. |
| Case summary | Case details |
| Compensation awarded | $180,000 |
| Client background | The client experienced pre-syncopal and syncopal episodes, including low heart rates and dizziness. |
| Nature of negligence | Wrongful insertion of a pacemaker; continued episodes post-procedure. |
| Claim process | Settlement reached to compensate for physical and emotional pain. |
| Reports |
|
| Client impact |
|
| Our approach |
|
| Outcome | Secured a settlement of $180,000. |
| Case summary | Case details |
| Compensation awarded | $3,750,000 |
| Client background | Our client was a mother who regularly attended antenatal care throughout her pregnancy in 1999. Despite a known history of complex deliveries and epilepsy, she was induced past term under inappropriate clinical conditions. |
| Nature of negligence | The child suffered intrapartum and neonatal asphyxia due to mismanaged labour and delayed resuscitation. Inappropriate delivery manoeuvres during shoulder dystocia contributed to the harm. |
| Claim process | Successfully settled with a $3.75 million compensation package to support the child’s extensive care needs. |
| Reports | Engaged leading specialists in obstetrics, paediatrics, and neonatal care, who concluded that the delivery techniques used were inappropriate and that there was a critical delay in initiating proper resuscitation. |
| Client impact | The child was diagnosed with Ataxic Cerebral Palsy and Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy, resulting in permanent intellectual and cognitive disabilities. The child now requires lifelong, around-the-clock care. |
| Our approach |
|
| Outcome | Secured a significant settlement to ensure lifelong care for the child. The resolution acknowledged the failings in obstetric care and provided vital support for the client’s family. |
Courts rely heavily on expert opinions to determine if negligence occurred.
Becoming qualified in medicine requires years of rigorous training. Judges, lacking medical expertise, must rely on a panel of industry specialists to determine whether negligence occurred. Given that many illnesses and injuries have multiple treatment options, experts often disagree on the best course of action. This complexity can make medical negligence claims less predictable than other types of public liability cases.
Unsuccessful treatments don’t always equate to negligence.
If you go to the supermarket or visit your local council, you don’t expect a life-changing injury or illness to occur because of an accident or negligence. However, medical treatments always carry some element of risk, and patients are—or should be—informed of this before agreeing to a procedure.
Establishing a direct link between the negligent act and the harm suffered can be difficult. A doctor may have made mistakes or even been negligent, but the judge may rule that these actions were not ultimately what caused your injuries.
Judges must make assumptions about patient decisions and potential health outcomes.
For example, when a patient isn’t adequately informed of the risks of surgery, would they have still agreed to the treatment if they’d been properly warned?
Cases can take years to resolve, accumulating significant costs.
You should discuss your claim with experienced medical negligence lawyers to ensure the compensation you may be eligible to receive is worth pursuing.
Choosing the right medical negligence lawyers is critical to the success of your claim. These cases are legally and medically complex, requiring lawyers with deep knowledge of healthcare standards, legal precedent, and the intricacies of personal injury law.
Many firms, including GMP Law, offer No Win No Fee arrangements for medical negligence claims. This means you can pursue justice without the burden of legal fees unless your claim is successful.
Under a No Win No Fee agreement, you can expect:
1.Seek medical attention
2.Preserve evidence
3.Legal consultation
| State/Territory | Time limit to claim |
| NSW | Three years from the date of negligence |
| VIC | Three years from discoverability |
| QLD | Three years from the date of negligence |
| WA | Three years from discoverability |
| SA | Three years from discoverability |
| TAS | Three years from discoverability |
| ACT | Three years from discoverability |
| NT | Three years from act or omission. |
The key difference is intent. Medical negligence involves unintentional mistakes, while medical malpractice involves a healthcare provider knowingly disregarding the standard of care.
Medical negligence happens when a provider unintentionally causes harm by failing to act with reasonable care. For example, a missed diagnosis due to an oversight. Medical malpractice goes a step further: it involves a conscious decision or reckless disregard for proper medical procedures. An example of medical malpractice might be a surgeon operating on the wrong body part after failing to verify patient records, even though protocols were in place. While both can lead to serious injury, malpractice often carries heavier legal consequences due to the provider’s awareness of the risk.
Compensation calculations consider both economic losses (medical expenses, lost income) and non-economic losses (pain and suffering). Amounts vary significantly based on injury severity, long-term impacts, age of victim, and strength of evidence.
Factors affecting compensation include:
In most cases, you have up to three years from the date you became aware of the medical negligence to lodge a claim. This time limit, known as the statute of limitations, exists to help ensure evidence remains reliable and that witness recollections are still clear.
However, the law does allow for exceptions in certain circumstances, such as cases involving children, individuals with disabilities, or when a diagnosis is significantly delayed. If you’re unsure whether you’re still within the time frame, it’s best to seek legal advice as soon as possible.
Yes, wrongful death claims allow certain family members to see compensation for medical negligence causing death. Eligible claimants typically include spouses, children, parents, and financially dependent relatives.
Wrongful death compensation may cover:
Medical negligence requires proving that care fell below accepted professional standards, not just that treatment was unsuccessful. Poor outcomes can occur even with appropriate care due to inherent medical risks.
Key distinctions:
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, medical negligence cases typically take three to four years from incident to resolution. However, timeframes vary significantly based on case complexity, whether settlement occurs, and court scheduling.
Factors affecting case duration:
GMP Law offers free initial consultations to help individuals determine if they have a viable case. Our experienced lawyers can guide you through the complex process of evaluating your situation and providing an estimated case timeline. We have offices across Australia, including in Sydney and Melbourne.
With 35 years of experience, we have successfully represented clients in personal injury cases across Australia, including:
The team at GMP® recognise the physical, emotional, and financial toll that injuries have on individuals and their families.
Our commitment to our clients includes:
GMP Law® is the only Australian firm that stands behind its service with a written cost reduction promise, offering you complete peace of mind with your claim. We are committed to delivering expert legal guidance with empathy and care, and will work tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome for our clients.
In the spirit of reconciliation GMP Law acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea, and community. We pay our respects to their Elders past, present, and emerging, and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.
Your location is currently:
