Cerebral palsy is often caused by accidents during live childbirth and could be linked to medical malpractice. The disorder could come from two types of
This matter involved a middle-aged man who attended a suburban shopping centre. Our client was walking towards the toilet area of the shopping centre, when his foot slipped on some clear liquid on the terrazzo tiles. As a result of the slip, our client lost his balance and fell landing on the unyielding surface of the terrazzo floor.
As a result of the fall, our client sustained a direct blow and laceration to the left knee, patellofemoral joint and skin as well as a ligament injury to the left ankle, and an injury to the lumbar spine. As a result of his ongoing pain and suffering, our client contacted Gerard Malouf and Partners to enquire about making a personal injury claim for compensation.
Gerard Malouf & Partners Compensation Lawyers began to gather evidence from our client’s treating doctors and had our client assessed by an expert orthopaedic surgeon, psychiatrist and occupational therapist to determine the extent of his injuries and provide a report on the impact these injuries had on his life.
Our team obtained an expert liability report from a safety management and building specialist, who provided the opinion that it should have been foreseeable to the Defendants, that eventually a person walking on the terrazzo tile flooring, when it has been contaminated with potential lubricants, within the shopping centre would experience a slip, loss of balance, fall and injury, unless appropriate preventative measures were effectively and unfailingly implemented.
Proceedings in the District Court were commenced against the shopping centre owner and the cleaners. A subpoena was issued on the Defendants for all documents in respect of the incident including CCTV footage. The CCTV footage demonstrated that there was a cleaner in the area 2 minutes prior to our client’s fall. This evidence made the case on liability particularly difficult given the Plaintiff was no longer able to establish that the cleaner failed to adhere to their inspection and cleaning arrangements and failed to have in place a reasonable system of cleaning.
Slips, trips and falls that occur in a public place, such as a shopping mall, car park or supermarket, can lead to public claims.
However, you must be able to show that your accident was due to negligence on behalf of the individual or organisation responsible for ensuring your safety in that environment.
In other words, you need to prove that you were owed a duty of care and that this was breached. You must also have suffered damage or an injury as a result of the negligence.
Public liability refers to the responsibilities owners or occupants of a public space have to protect anyone who enters. If the owners or occupants fall short of these responsibilities, resulting in an injury, a case for compensation can be made.
Some of the most common incidents covered by public liability law include:
Following an initial meeting, the first task will be to establish the general facts of the case. This will include your medical diagnosis, which will need to be confirmed and documented by a doctor; and proof that the person or company at fault owed you a duty of care, which will need to be demonstrated. Together, this will show that your injury occurred when they breached that duty of care.
From there a further investigation will proceed—contacting and interviewing witnesses, speaking with expert consultants, and more—all in order to bolster the strength of your case even further. Only once this process is complete, and your claim can be demonstrated and proven in full, will the process move on to the next step.
Public liability claims enable you to recoup the financial and emotional costs of suffering an injury due to someone else’s negligence. Defendants regularly offer monetary settlements to claimants, particularly if they acknowledge liability and believe they would lose in court.
But should you accept the settlement or proceed to the later stages of litigation instead, where a judge will have the final decision? Every case is different, but here are some of the factors you may wish to consider before making your choice:
Case Overview Our client is a self-employed contractor who suffered an injury to his right knee on-site and received compensation. A few years later, he
Case Overview Our client was a young man who went to meet his mates at a pub in winter. They were in the outdoor area
Case Overview Our client attended a hospital complaining of back pain and right leg symptoms but was misdiagnosed and discharged home. Later he crashed his
Case Overview Our client had recently moved into a rented property where she fell over a 70cm gap leading to tears to her ligamentous muscles
Case Overview Our client was involved in a motor vehicle accident riding an unregistered bicycle, was not wearing a helmet, and did not hold a
Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...