Change location v

$180,000 settlement for unnecessary and wrongful insertion of a pacemaker

Case Overview
  • Our client experienced pre-syncopal and syncopal episodes, with associated low heart rates, dizziness and loss of consciousness.
  • The plaintiff was considered suitable for a pacemaker implantation, yet still experienced synocopal episodes after getting the procedure. 
  • A settlement of $180,000 inclusive of legal costs was agreed upon to compensate our client for the physical and emotional pain and suffering she had experienced from unnecessary pacemaker implantation.

In early 2019, our client gave birth to her child. Afterwards, she experienced instances of a low heart rate and received cardiac treatment. During 2019, our client experienced multiple pre-syncopal and syncopal episodes, with included instances of low heart rates, dizziness and loss of consciousness. Following one such episode, our client was deemed by her treating doctor to be suitable for a pacemaker. 

During the insertion, the pacemaker was damaged due to over-tightening of the stitching, which rendered the pacemaker unable to accurately track and manage our client’s condition. As a result, our client continued to experience syncopal episodes. Our client eventually had the pacemaker removed and experienced an improvement in her condition.

"Our skilled and experienced lawyers at Gerard Malouf & Partners recognise that pain and suffering, even for a short period, can nonetheless have a significant impact on an individual."

Our Approach

As a result of the physical scarring from the unnecessarily inserted pacemaker and the resulting mental distress to our client, she contacted Gerard Malouf & Partners to commence a claim against the doctors.

We received reports from a cardiologist who was critical in the decision to insert the pacemaker. Our medical expert decided that the medical staff for our client lacked a clear correlation between the arrhythmia and syncope on testing in May 2019. 

What this meant was that most other medical professionals in the same situation would have seen that our client either did not need a pacemaker or that the device was inserted incorrectly. Additionally, our client was postpartum and suffering transitory sinus bradycardia, which further contra-indicated the insertion of the pacemaker and would not have treated her condition.

We also obtained a report from a psychologist who diagnosed our client with a health anxiety disorder, or hypochondria. 

A report from an occupational therapist indicated that our client had required significant domestic care and assistance following the implementation of the pacemaker and after its removal.

The case went all the way up to mediation where we argued on behalf of the client. Although the mediation was unsuccessful, ongoing negotiations continued between the parties. We reached a settlement sum of $180,000, inclusive of legal costs, to compensate our client for the physical and emotional pain and suffering she had experienced. 

If you have an enquiry in relation to a potential medical negligence claim, please call us on 1800 004 878 and speak to one of our medical negligence lawyers.

The Result

A settlement of $180,000 inclusive of legal costs was agreed upon to compensate our client for the physical and emotional pain and suffering she had experienced

Frequently Asked Questions

More Information

Demonstrating that a doctor fell short of their duty of care can be a challenging process. While most doctors try their best to correctly diagnose conditions and provide timely medical treatment, they can’t always be right. In every state, protections are in place to shield practitioners from some litigation. These give practitioners peace of mind on the job and protect hospitals that are doing their best with limited resources. However, these laws also set the bar for receiving compensation incredibly high.

Overall, to win a favorable judgment, you must be able to prove Duty, Breach and Damages.

If you have been injured or an existing condition has worsened following a medical procedure or doctor visit, then you may have been the victim of medical negligence and you could be eligible to make medical negligence claims against the professional who caused your injury.

If you show that you have suffered harm and that a medical professional failed in their duty of care, you may be entitled to compensation.

The process can be long, but the start can be found at an RCA (root cause analysis) which must be undertaken and can be discovered by obtaining copies of the medical notes at the institution where the unfortunate outcome occurred.

Explore

More Case Summaries

About Us
Gerard Malouf & Partners have provided friendly, experienced legal advice to communities across Australia for over 35 years. Our Personal Injury Lawyers have taken on ten’s of thousands of cases and we are proud to have won billions of dollars for our clients.
Lawyers
Meet the diverse and dynamic team of compensation lawyers and supporting staff that have made this all happen below. Our multi-lingual team can discuss your claims in Arabic, Assyrian, Turkish, Greek, Italian, French, Serbian, Croatian, Armenian, Mandarin, Hindi, Punjabi or Malayalam.
Resources
Meet the diverse and dynamic team of compensation lawyers and supporting staff that have made this all happen below. Our multi-lingual team can discuss your claims in Arabic, Assyrian, Turkish, Greek, Italian, French, Serbian, Croatian, Armenian, Mandarin, Hindi, Punjabi or Malayalam.

Your location is currently: